It really depends on the patch too, but setting the sliders the same on my 101 vs the plugin they sound quite different. It certainly has the same essence, but just doesn't capture the size and mojo of the original. My point isn't to knock Tal (I am a fan and use their products), just chiming in with real world knowledge that the synth has a some extra "mojo" (lol) that the VST doesn't.Cheers for the info! I think I might give the TAL Baseline a go! To be honest I was actually blown away by the Roland emulation until I bought a real one. email protected 5 Mixing Tips You Should Be Using. Togu Audio Line TAL-BassLine 101 VST is an imposing monophonic bass synthesizer as well as a very accurate emulation of the famous SH-101. But without a doubt, LuSH-101 is among the absolute best sounding software synthesizers I've ever used, and it's monstrously powerfulunlike the TAL option, it doesn't just aim to mimic the hardware, it builds on that architecture with a superb layering system and lots of sophisticated goodies. However, I do hear the difference with the real synth, and the difference is big enough enough that I replace the VST track with a recording of the actual 101. Meticulously crafted, Sytrus delivers ethereal lush pads, sonorous bells, scintillating highs or simply dirty grunge. In a mix they all sound convincing to me. ![]() I think the Tal emulation is great (the U-No 106 is great too) and I do use it when writing, or traveling. I have the Tal Bassline, and I own an SH-101.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |